Are missionaries cultural imperialists? Are they just like the profit-hungry commercialist? There have indeed been many occasions where missionaries have failed to befriend several tribes and were responsible for needless destruction of cultures. However, we cannot ignore the relentless dedication and determination from missionaries to bring Christianity to these tribesmen and enhance their culture to make it world-fitting.

From ‘Abner hale’ and ‘fray Diego de Landa’ missionaries have sometimes acted in a culture-destroying manner. Do we ignore what the UFM missionaries have accomplished with the Wai Wai culture? What about the amazing feat by numerous missionary groups like The Missionary Alliance? History has proved that leaving these uncivilized people doesn’t work and that somebody needs to get there to help and guide these people into Christianity. They risk their lives to get them first because they believe that they are ‘more sympathetic agents of change than profit hungry commercialists’. These tribes cannot be completely isolated from the rest of the world. They need to communicate. The missionaries are just providing a more convincing way for them to merge and become a part in our society.

Missionaries use moral persuasions to engage with the tribes, and they know what will happen to these people when they fail to deliver the message; the government will eventually use physical force. As Don Richardson puts, the missionaries are giving the tribal ‘a rational basis for giving it up voluntarily before the guns of the police decide the issue with traumatic effect’

People say that missionaries are destroying cultures. Even though the outer appearance and act may change, influenced by outside people, the center core of a culture doesn’t change. The missionaries aren’t disregarding the values of culture and faith but they are simply refining certain aspects of a culture to make them ‘better’. The introduction of Christianity has already begun and we should now make them feel like they are part our society.


It is hard to determine who have “uncivilized cultures”. But we know there are cultures around the world that are isolated and unrecognized in the world’s spotlight. There are perhaps hundreds of ‘uncivilized cultures’ like the Sawi, prevalent around the world that we haven’t even heard of. What should society do for them? Do we just let them be who they are and act as if nothing is happening in their disintegrating culture?

We are at the time of history when tribes like the Sawi can be influenced by the others. We should teach them what we value in the world and show them how we practice our faiths. Before doing this we should learn and experience the ‘uncivilized cultures’ just like what Don Richardson did. We don’t expect them to transform suddenly because we know how difficult accepting a whole new culture and I know this because I have experienced twice in my lifetime; when I went to Malaysia and Switzerland. The cultural shock I felt is incomparable to what the Sawi must have felt. It may take long for them to accept the reality and we shouldn’t doubt that there will be any changes to these people but we must have patience, faith and trust. They will slowly acknowledge and become ‘civilized’

“The advanced enforces the behind or the behind resist the advanced” We are not telling them that our culture is right and that theirs is wrong. We are not demanding for them to abandon their culture and faiths. We are not forcing them to become just like us. We just want what is the best for them because we have compassion and respect towards their culture. There may be obstacles, disrupting our guidance but our passion and patience will overcome whatever stands in front of us.

Breaking through cultural barrier

Different people have different perspectives about how to judge the nature of human culture and it is inevitable that there are imprudent misunderstandings and misconceptions when cultures are confronted. There are countless cultures around the world, some have been more dominating than the others and some have been excluded from our society, unknown but still maintaining their uprooted tradition. What should we do when we are confronted with other cultures? What should we de when we are confronted with cultures that we have never heard of existence?

There are situations where people tend to show the positive side of their culture and conceal the side that they don’t want others to see. This makes perfect sense because people have always wanted to show the best of what they have. This is a human nature that cannot easily be altered. People only tend to embrace the outstanding fruits of human culture but we have to recognize that what we are seeing isn’t everything about it. There might be cultures that seem to show some negative sides and in the other hand there are cultures that brag about how wonderful and enticing their culture is but as a matter of a fact the one that is being honest may be the one that people are looking for. Instead of judging according to their appearance, we should try to understand and experience what other cultures value.

There are also situations where people discard the excellence of other cultures. They either feel jealous or they might be feeling the danger of the uprising power. I think it is morally wrong to deny cultures because they are simply better than us or to compete with each other over whose culture is superior. I mean, it is natural that there are conflicts when two cultures meet because it is evident throughout the course of our history that the acceptance of other cultures hasn’t been smoothed. When people are confronted with cultures that are exemplary, people should learn how to acknowledge the righteousness and strive to enhance their own.

God wants people to understand each other. God wants people to live peacefully, acknowledge other cultures and respect their faiths. People have to stay open-mined and embrace what other value - just like giving free hugs.

When we are confronted with ‘uncivilized’ culture like the Sawi, we shouldn’t force them to change their culture and faith but we should rather wait with patience until they have trust and respect in what we pursue. People will know that we are harmless and what we are bringing is for the best of their culture. When I first encountered Swiss culture, I felt perplexed because it was a great cultural shock for me. The reason why I became to like Swiss culture and even love it is because nobody has forced me to accept something I wasn’t ready for. Of course the transition hasn’t been perfect, having few tumbles but I slowly came to accept what they believe and what they value. People haven’t urged me to change but they waited for me with patience and that won my appeal.

It seems that the process of accepting another culture cannot go entirely peacefully. Perhaps this is God’s intention because people learn form their mistakes. People accept the virtue when they have experienced how bad evil is. A culture cannot be ideal from the beginning of the creation but there had to be adjustments to cover the flaws and to make a more ‘idealized’ culture. In our standards, there is no perfect culture; it can only get better.



Before I continue reading the 'Peace child' I think it is necessary to know what the author himself values in this world and how he relates to faith. He is a Canadian Christian missionary who worked with indigenous tribes of Western New Guinea especially with the Sawi who were notorious for being 'cannibalistic' and 'headhunters'. Don Richardson believes that God has given evangelization to these people by some practices or understandings that he refers to as 'redemptive analogies' and he stresses that the 'spirit of god' can regenerate these people who just seem malicious and hopeless. His 'faith' that concerns about teaching the minorities how to communicate to Jesus Christ in a meaningful way is demonstrated when he and his wife risked their lives to travel a region that has the world's most violent cultures. He was exposed to many diseases such as malaria, dysentery and others but the fact that he confronted these obstacles shows how he was dedicated and convinced about changing the way the Sawi people think and how they regard about the world.


As I read the book, I am more convinced that the Sawi aren't 'ordinary' and they certainly give me a cultural shock; who would have expected that there are still some people out there in the world who eat other human beings and value treachery as an ideal? To these people, the idealization of treachery is part of their culture and they even think that it is appropriate to take advantage by 'fattening victims with friendships'. The Sawi culture is distinctive to the rest of the cultures that exist in this world, having its own world view, keeping a small 'cosmos' to themselves, worshipping their ancestors and revering their own sets of legends.


Nowadays, people are becoming modernized and I think that communication is the key to acknowledge that there are different ways in which people can approach the 'spirit of God'. I believe that we, as 'civilized people', should encourage the minorities to accept the teaching of Jesus Christ just like what the author did to the Sawi.


Faith is defined as 'a belief in the trustworthiness of an idea'. It is often reserved for religious concepts but there can be many forms; people can just put their faith into simple objects that they consider valuable or meaningful, people devote their faith into someone they adore or even people who practice 'nihilism' has a belief that there is virtually no meaning of life. I already answered what faith is and now I am faced with more questions and doubts. Why do people need to have faith in something? Why does faith have a significant impact in shaping who we are and who we are going to be?


The thing about faith is that when you are sure about the meaning and the purpose the more unsure you become and when you think that you understand everything about it, there are new questions that challenge the validity of your faith. Many people in many generations have searched for the ultimate value of faith, and indeed many of them have reached the zenith but nobody has been able to go beyond the limit.


'Faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen' -Bible


In reality, there are internal conflicts that are triggered by contrasting definitions of faiths and these were often the subject of acrimonious remarks which was a way of expressing hatred towards the others. The thing that people should realize is that there is no right or wrong answer about faith because it is just 'an act, an intention and a project'. It is something that enables you to understand about what you believe and provides a chance to understand more about yourself.


Faith is not belief. Belief is passive. Faith is active -Edith Hamilton


Now I should distinguish between the terms 'belief' and 'faith'. People who think that they have the 'right faith' may question others who are struggling to find the answer; what is difficult about finding faith? Taking the first step in faith is problematic for so many people because they often tend to see the inevitable consequence first. This makes faith magnificent because once you start to have it, you can reach the highest level of humankind. There is no reward for those who don't take actions, expecting for the Almighty to give him or her answer but there is reward who those who wait patiently for the instructions and follow with their hearts and faiths.

In some way, faith represents the total personality of a person. This may be exaggerated but in my perspective, faith represents every component of a person's life and reflects the way people think and regard about the world. People often judge other people with what they can perceive in the 'outer surface' especially connecting to faiths and they are doomed to criticize and question about the validity of different ideas and beliefs that they think are wrong. Faith also has a special power, uniting people with different opinions by the mean of communication and this is the key to accept the truth that there is no right or wrong answer to faith.

Newer Posts Older Posts Home